雅思写作练习 · Task 2 议论文（附范文与拆解）

观点类（Opinion / Agree-Disagree）是 Task 2 最高频题型。本题配完整范文、结构框架、句式与词汇亮点。

题目 Task

Some people believe that governments should spend more money on public transport rather than on building more roads for private cars.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

审题要点（答题前先想这 3 件事）

1. 题型：Agree-Disagree（观点类）→ 全文必须有清晰立场，避免"骑墙"
2. 范围：比较对象是"公共交通投入" vs "道路建设投入"——要对比，不是只夸公共交通
3. 结构：Introduction（立场）→ Body 1（同意的理由）→ Body 2（承认另一面/限定范围）→ Conclusion

范文（约 285 词）

It is often argued that governments should prioritise investment in public transport over the expansion of road networks for private vehicles. While I strongly agree that public transport deserves the larger share of funding, I believe that roads should not be neglected entirely.

There are two main reasons why public transport should take priority. Firstly, it offers a far more efficient use of limited space and public money. A single metro line can carry tens of thousands of passengers per hour, whereas the same volume of commuters would require motorways and vast areas of parking space. Secondly, shifting travellers from cars to trains and buses significantly reduces carbon emissions and air pollution, which are among the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. In many European cities, heavy investment in rail networks has demonstrably eased congestion and improved urban air quality.

However, it would be short-sighted to argue that road building should be abandoned altogether. In rural areas and many developing regions, public transport is sparse or non-existent, and roads remain the only viable means of moving goods and people. Moreover, buses, delivery vehicles and emergency services all depend on adequate road infrastructure. A country that starves its roads of maintenance funding may simply find that its freight costs rise and its remote communities become even more isolated.

That said, the solution is not to treat the two as equal competitors. The evidence from successful cities suggests that funding should flow disproportionately towards public transport, while roads receive enough to remain safe and functional. Governments can also use other measures — congestion charges, parking restrictions and bus lanes — to make car travel less attractive and public transport more convenient, thereby reinforcing the effect of the investment.

In conclusion, I agree that public transport should receive the majority of government funding, because it is more efficient and more sustainable. Nevertheless, a sensible transport policy will maintain a basic level of road investment, particularly where no alternative exists.

结构拆解（高分逻辑线）

高分秘诀：不是"全盘同意"或"完全反对"，而是"立场清晰 + 承认复杂性 + 给出方案"——这正是雅思 7 分以上的特征。

句式与词汇亮点（可直接迁移）

句式：

• It is often argued that…（引入话题）
• While I strongly agree that…, I believe that…（部分同意句式）
• There are two main reasons why…（展开理由）
• It would be short-sighted to argue that…（反驳句式）
• That said, the solution is not to…（深化立场）
• Nevertheless, … will maintain…（收尾限定）

词汇：

• prioritise investment / deserve the larger share of funding（资金倾斜）
• a far more efficient use of（更高效的利用）
• demonstrably eased congestion（显著缓解拥堵）
• short-sighted（目光短浅的）
• viable means of moving goods（可行的运输方式）
• flow disproportionately towards（不成比例地流向）
• reinforce the effect（强化效果）

自测清单（写完对照）

1. 立场是否在开头就清晰？✅
2. 主体段是否有具体例证（城市/数据/常识）？✅
3. 是否回应了题目中的"rather than"（做了对比）？✅
4. 连接词是否多样（Firstly / However / That said / Nevertheless）？✅
5. 词数是否 ≥ 250？✅