雅思阅读 110: The Great Reallocation (供应链大迁移)

改编自 EY-Parthenon / Bain & Company / IMF 研究综述。雅思阅读 Section 3 难度，约 1050 词。 素材来源：https://informedclearly.com/en/geopolitics/52861/global-supply-chains-fragment-2026

Reading Passage

A. For three decades, the organising principle of the world economy was simplicity itself: make things wherever they could be made most cheaply, then ship them across the world. "Just-in-time" delivery kept inventories lean, profits high and consumers supplied. Few questioned a model that had delivered a generation of falling prices for everything from smartphones to T-shirts. Then, in the space of a few turbulent years, that consensus broke. Pandemic lockdowns closed factories, the Suez Canal clogged, port backlogs piled containers higher than skyscrapers, and a tariff war began to redraw the map of trade. By the time supply chains began to move again, the question was no longer whether to globalise further, but how fast to unwind what had been built. Surveys now find that roughly three-quarters of chief executives are actively localising some production, and over half are reorganising their networks around regional blocs rather than around a single global factory floor. The change is not confined to one political moment. It spans governments of left and right, and industries from electronics to pharmaceuticals, because the shock that exposed the old model's weakness was not a policy but a pandemic: when borders closed, every firm discovered at once how far away its most vital supplier really was.

B. The reshuffle has acquired a vocabulary all its own. Reshoring means bringing production back to the firm's home country; nearshoring means moving it to a nearby, friendly nation; friendshoring means shifting sourcing toward geopolitically aligned countries even if they are farther away. A related watchword, "China plus one", captures the habit of keeping one foot in the established workshop while opening a second Asian location as insurance. Behind the jargon lies a quiet revolution in what managers optimise for. For thirty years the goal was cost. A recent Bain survey found that more than four out of five executives now plan to bring supply chains closer to home, up from around three in five just two years earlier. Perhaps the most revealing figure is the one nobody likes to advertise: companies are willing to accept an extra 15 percent or more in costs in exchange for not being cut off again. That is an extraordinary price to pay for peace of mind, and it signals how thoroughly the old cost-only logic has lost its grip.

C. The statistics make the shift tangible. Direct American sourcing from China has been falling since the first wave of tariffs in 2018, and the trade has not simply vanished — it has been rerouted. The big winners are low-wage nations in Southeast Asia, notably Vietnam, and countries on the United States' own doorstep, above all Mexico, whose proximity to American factories gives it an unmatchable advantage when freight speed matters. Tariff changes in 2025 accelerated the rerouting still further, diverting orders toward partners facing lower duties and shorter shipping lanes. Economists describe it as a "great reallocation" rather than as decoupling from the world: America buys as much as ever, but from a different, longer and more deliberate list of suppliers. The era of the single cheapest source, in other words, is giving way to the era of the multiple, resilient source. It is a quiet revolution on the docks and in the boardroom: the same container ships still ply the same oceans, but the labels on many of their contents now read differently. An electronics firm that once sourced entirely from one coastal Chinese city may now split its production between a factory in Hanoi, an assembly plant in northern Mexico and a finishing line back on its home soil. The container still moves, but the map behind it has been redrawn.

D. Governments have not merely watched from the sidelines; they have actively pushed the retreat. Legislation such as the United States' CHIPS and Science Act and the European Union's Chips Act lavish subsidies on domestic semiconductor manufacturing, on the argument that cutting-edge technology cannot be left to a single, potentially hostile supplier. Three successive American administrations have pursued reshoring in different styles, from renegotiating trade blocs to writing industrial policy into law. The logic has migrated from economics to national security. Where once a government might shrug off a factory moving overseas, it now sees dependence on a rival for medicines, batteries or microchips as a strategic vulnerability. Efficiency, the old north star of globalisation, is no longer the only virtue; reliability is, and reliability costs money.

E. Whether the new model delivers its promised security, however, remains an open question. Shorter, regional supply chains are safer against distant shocks but more expensive at every stage, and some economists warn that the world is trading a known ailment — occasional bottlenecks — for a slower, more inflation-prone future. Diversification can itself breed risk: the factories opened in a hurry in friendly countries may be less skilled, less reliable or more corrupt than the ones they replace. And a world organised into competing blocs raises the cost of every transaction and slows the diffusion of technology. What is certain is that the assumptions of the 1990s and 2000s will not return unchanged. The pandemic proved, at a cost measured in trillions, that the cheapest chain is not always the one you want when it breaks. The great reallocation now under way is the long, expensive reckoning for that lesson. Whether it leaves the world poorer but safer, or merely slower and more divided, will depend on whether the new regional networks are built with enough goodwill and enough free exchange between blocs to avoid becoming the walls that some already fear. For now, the age of the single global supplier is over, and something costlier, sturdier and far less elegant has taken its place.

Questions 1-4

Choose the correct heading for paragraphs B, C, D and E from the list of headings below.

List of Headings i. New words for a new strategy — and the cost executives will now pay ii. Where the trade actually went — a reallocation, not a retreat iii. Governments turn supply chains into a security question iv. The bill for resilience — and an uncertain future v. How just-in-time manufacturing was invented vi. Why consumers no longer want cheap goods vii. The history of the Suez Canal

1. Paragraph B: ____
2. Paragraph C: ____
3. Paragraph D: ____
4. Paragraph E: ____

Questions 5-8

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

5. What does "nearshoring" mean? A. Moving production to a nearby, friendly country. B. Moving production back to the firm's home country. C. Moving production to the cheapest possible location. D. Stopping all international trade.

6. According to the Bain survey, what share of executives now plan to bring supply chains closer to home? A. About 40%. B. About 60%. C. About 80%. D. About 95%.

7. Which countries are cited as the main winners of the rerouted trade? A. China and Japan. B. Vietnam and Mexico. C. Russia and Brazil. D. India and Pakistan.

8. How does the writer characterise the new willingness to pay more? A. Companies accept around 15% extra cost in return for resilience. B. Companies refuse to pay anything extra. C. Costs have actually fallen by 15%. D. Only governments pay the extra cost.

Questions 9-13

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer?

Write:

• TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
• FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
• NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

9. Direct American sourcing from China has been falling since 2018.
10. The writer argues that the world is fully decoupling from all trade.
11. The United States and the European Union have both used subsidies to support domestic chip manufacturing.
12. The new regional supply chains are universally cheaper than the old global ones.
13. Vietnam's largest export to the United States is rice.

Questions 14-15

Complete the summary below using NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage.

For three decades the guiding principle was cost, embodied in "just-in-time" delivery. The new model favours resilience over efficiency, and firms are increasingly willing to pay an extra 15 percent for supply chains they describe as "(14) __________". Economists prefer to call the resulting reshuffle a great (15) __________ rather than a return to autarky.

答案与解析

← 上一篇 | 返回雅思焦点 | 下一篇 →